Comments on: 5 reasons why Google did succeed but others did not (must read for Googler’s) http://www.etiole.com/2008/12/5-reasons-why-google-did-succeed-but-others-did-not-must-read-for-googlers/ Dream Tech. Live Tech. Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:06:54 +0000 hourly 1 By: slots http://www.etiole.com/2008/12/5-reasons-why-google-did-succeed-but-others-did-not-must-read-for-googlers/#comment-6805 Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:06:54 +0000 http://lipoliticpress.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/5-reasons-why-google-did-succeed-but-others-did-not-must-read-for-googlers/#comment-6805 60409 668164Could it be okay to write several of this on my small web website only incorporate a one way link to the website? 290855

]]> By: Albert http://www.etiole.com/2008/12/5-reasons-why-google-did-succeed-but-others-did-not-must-read-for-googlers/#comment-121 Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:16:00 +0000 http://lipoliticpress.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/5-reasons-why-google-did-succeed-but-others-did-not-must-read-for-googlers/#comment-121 Interesting Monik,

Here the difference is in their service. Look the Google’s homepage and Yahoo’s homepage. Google have more visitors for search results. But after Google’s monopoly in searching, it is not problem for Yahoo. Still Yahoo having that Portal service with Search Box. But they updated the Search features such as Search Suggestions and URL keyword crawling. So Both Yahoo and Google is not a competitors.

But Indians, need to rock on this Internet Services. here I could not understand, that Guruji.com. They need to setup something new innovations in Search Results. Still they are in Meta search results.

Thanks…
Albert

]]>